I’m a little confused about how the burden of proof ended up as it is in this discussion.
Among people generally, the burden of proof is the opposite of what you perceived it to be in this discussion. But this post was responding to a blog post claiming the arguments for legally prohibiting blackmail aren’t persuasive.
But in any case, the point of the discussion is to sharpen our intuitions, or even discard then if warranted.
Among people generally, the burden of proof is the opposite of what you perceived it to be in this discussion. But this post was responding to a blog post claiming the arguments for legally prohibiting blackmail aren’t persuasive.
But in any case, the point of the discussion is to sharpen our intuitions, or even discard then if warranted.