I was wondering if it would be a good idea to offer a download of LW or at least the sequences and Wiki. In the manner that Wikipedia is providing it.
The idea behind it is to have a redundant backup in case of some catastrophe, for example if the same happens to EY that happened to John C. Wright. It could also provide the option to read LW offline.
Every so often, people derisively say to me “Oh, and you assume you’d never convert to religion then?” I always reply “I absolutely do not assume that, it might happen to me; no-one is immune to mental illness.”
Tricycle has the data. Also if an event of JCW magnitude happened to me I’m pretty sure I could beat it. I know at least one rationalist with intense religious experiences who successfully managed to ask questions like “So how come the divine spirit can’t tell me the twentieth digit of pi?” and discount them.
Actually, you have to be sure that you wouldn’t convert if you had John Wright’s experiences, otherwise Aumann’s agreement theorem should cause you to convert already, simply because John Wright had the experiences himself—assuming you wouldn’t say he’s lying. I actually know someone who converted to religion on account of a supposed miracle, who said afterward that since they in fact knew before converting that other people had seen such things happen, they should have converted in the first place.
Although I have to admit I don’t see why the divine spirit would want to tell you the 20th digit of pi anyway, so hopefully there would be a better argument than that.
What if you sustained hypoxic brain injury, as JCW may well have done during his cardiac event? (This might also explain why he think it’s cool to write BSDM scenes featuring a 16-year-old schoolgirl as part of an ostensibly respectable work of SF, so it’s a pet suspicion of mine.)
his might also explain why he think it’s cool to write BSDM scenes featuring a 16-year-old schoolgirl as part of an ostensibly respectable work of SF, so it’s a pet suspicion of mine.
It would seem he is just writing for Mature Audiences. In this case maturity means not just ‘the age at which we let people read pornographic text’ but the kind of maturity that allows people to look beyond their own cultural prejudices.
16 is old. Not old enough according to our culture but there is no reason we should expect a fictional time-distant culture to have our particular moral or legal prescriptions. It wouldn’t be all that surprising if someone from an actual future time to, when reading the work, scoff at how prudish a culture would have to be to consider sexualised portrayals of women that age to be taboo!
Mind you I do see how a hypoxic brain injury could alter someone’s moral inhibitions and sensibilities in the kind of way you suggest. I just don’t include loaded language in the speculation.
16 is old. Not old enough according to our culture but there is no reason we should expect a fictional time-distant culture to have our particular moral or legal prescriptions. It wouldn’t be all that surprising if someone from an actual future time to, when reading the work, scoff at how prudish a culture would have to be to consider sexualised portrayals of women that age to be taboo!
Interestingly, if the book in question is the one I think it is, it takes place in Britain, where the age of consent is, in fact, sixteen.
Come to think of it, 16 is the age of consent here (Australia—most states) too. I should have used ‘your’ instead of ‘our’ in the paragraph you quote! It seems I was just running with the assumption.
(This might also explain why he think it’s cool to write BSDM scenes featuring a 16-year-old schoolgirl as part of an ostensibly respectable work of SF, so it’s a pet suspicion of mine.)
Point of curiosity: Does anyone else still notice this sort of thing? I don’t think my generation does anymore.
I’ve only read his Golden Age trilogy, so if it’s there, then no, to this 50-something it didn’t stand out from everything else that happened. If it’s in something else, I doubt it would. I mean, I’ve read Richard Morgan’s ultra-violent stuff, including the gay mediæval-style fantasy one, and, well, no.
[ETA: from Google the book in question appears to be Orphans of Chaos.]
Well, I’m female. Could be women tend to be more sensitive to that kind of thing.
That said, I wasn’t really planning to start a discussion about sexually explicit portrayals of sub-18 teenagers and whether they’re ok, and I doubt I’ll participate further in one. Unfortunately I don’t own the book, so if anyone is curious about the details of what I was referring to, they’ll have to read Orphans of Chaos (not that I recommend it on its merits). I wouldn’t hazard a guess as to how much a person can be oblivious to (probably a lot), but I’d be surprised if most people’s conscious, examined reaction to the sexual content (which is abundant and spread throughout the book, though not hardcore) was closer to “That is normal/A naturalistic portrayal of a 16-year-old girl’s sexual feelings/Literary envelope-pushing” than to “That is weird/creepy.”
Certainly there are other explanations. If you can show me that JCW openly wrote highly sexualized portrayals of people below the age of consent before his religious experience/heart attack, I will be happy to retract.
Iron Sunrise by Charles Stross and Cowl by Neal Asher feature sex scenes with 16 year old girls. I don’t remember to what detail though.
BSDM scenes featuring a 16-year-old schoolgirl
That sounds suspicious indeed and I would oppose it in most circumstances. That is, if it isn’t just a 16 year old body or simulation of a body (yeah no difference?) and if it isn’t just the description of how bad someone is...within SF you can naturally create exceptional circumstances.
Have you read books by Richard Morgan? The torture scences in the Takeshi novels are some of the most detailed. As virtual reality allows them to load you into the body of pregnant women, being raped and having soldering-iron slided up your vagina. And if you die due to hours of torture, just restart the simulation. Just one of the scenes from the first book.
However, if EY converted to religion, he would (in that condition) assert that he had had good reasons for doing it, i.e. that it was rational. So he would have no reason to take down this website anyway.
I would argue that one cannot own the information stored on the computers of other, unrelated people.
I support this idea also. I actually intend to make a service for uploading the content of forum/blog to alternate server for backup service, but who knows when it will happen.
LW database download?
I was wondering if it would be a good idea to offer a download of LW or at least the sequences and Wiki. In the manner that Wikipedia is providing it.
The idea behind it is to have a redundant backup in case of some catastrophe, for example if the same happens to EY that happened to John C. Wright. It could also provide the option to read LW offline.
That’s incredibly sad.
Every so often, people derisively say to me “Oh, and you assume you’d never convert to religion then?” I always reply “I absolutely do not assume that, it might happen to me; no-one is immune to mental illness.”
Tricycle has the data. Also if an event of JCW magnitude happened to me I’m pretty sure I could beat it. I know at least one rationalist with intense religious experiences who successfully managed to ask questions like “So how come the divine spirit can’t tell me the twentieth digit of pi?” and discount them.
Actually, you have to be sure that you wouldn’t convert if you had John Wright’s experiences, otherwise Aumann’s agreement theorem should cause you to convert already, simply because John Wright had the experiences himself—assuming you wouldn’t say he’s lying. I actually know someone who converted to religion on account of a supposed miracle, who said afterward that since they in fact knew before converting that other people had seen such things happen, they should have converted in the first place.
Although I have to admit I don’t see why the divine spirit would want to tell you the 20th digit of pi anyway, so hopefully there would be a better argument than that.
Here’s a more detailed version (starting at “I know a transhumanist who has strong religious visions”).
What if you sustained hypoxic brain injury, as JCW may well have done during his cardiac event? (This might also explain why he think it’s cool to write BSDM scenes featuring a 16-year-old schoolgirl as part of an ostensibly respectable work of SF, so it’s a pet suspicion of mine.)
It would seem he is just writing for Mature Audiences. In this case maturity means not just ‘the age at which we let people read pornographic text’ but the kind of maturity that allows people to look beyond their own cultural prejudices.
16 is old. Not old enough according to our culture but there is no reason we should expect a fictional time-distant culture to have our particular moral or legal prescriptions. It wouldn’t be all that surprising if someone from an actual future time to, when reading the work, scoff at how prudish a culture would have to be to consider sexualised portrayals of women that age to be taboo!
Mind you I do see how a hypoxic brain injury could alter someone’s moral inhibitions and sensibilities in the kind of way you suggest. I just don’t include loaded language in the speculation.
Interestingly, if the book in question is the one I think it is, it takes place in Britain, where the age of consent is, in fact, sixteen.
Come to think of it, 16 is the age of consent here (Australia—most states) too. I should have used ‘your’ instead of ‘our’ in the paragraph you quote! It seems I was just running with the assumption.
Although “18 years old” does seem to be a hard-and-fast rule for when you can legally appear in porn everywhere, as far as I know...
Point of curiosity: Does anyone else still notice this sort of thing? I don’t think my generation does anymore.
I’ve only read his Golden Age trilogy, so if it’s there, then no, to this 50-something it didn’t stand out from everything else that happened. If it’s in something else, I doubt it would. I mean, I’ve read Richard Morgan’s ultra-violent stuff, including the gay mediæval-style fantasy one, and, well, no.
[ETA: from Google the book in question appears to be Orphans of Chaos.]
I could be an outlier though.
Well, I’m female. Could be women tend to be more sensitive to that kind of thing.
That said, I wasn’t really planning to start a discussion about sexually explicit portrayals of sub-18 teenagers and whether they’re ok, and I doubt I’ll participate further in one. Unfortunately I don’t own the book, so if anyone is curious about the details of what I was referring to, they’ll have to read Orphans of Chaos (not that I recommend it on its merits). I wouldn’t hazard a guess as to how much a person can be oblivious to (probably a lot), but I’d be surprised if most people’s conscious, examined reaction to the sexual content (which is abundant and spread throughout the book, though not hardcore) was closer to “That is normal/A naturalistic portrayal of a 16-year-old girl’s sexual feelings/Literary envelope-pushing” than to “That is weird/creepy.”
Eh, you see people trying to “push boundaries” in “respectable” literature all the time anyway.
Certainly there are other explanations. If you can show me that JCW openly wrote highly sexualized portrayals of people below the age of consent before his religious experience/heart attack, I will be happy to retract.
Iron Sunrise by Charles Stross and Cowl by Neal Asher feature sex scenes with 16 year old girls. I don’t remember to what detail though.
That sounds suspicious indeed and I would oppose it in most circumstances. That is, if it isn’t just a 16 year old body or simulation of a body (yeah no difference?) and if it isn’t just the description of how bad someone is...within SF you can naturally create exceptional circumstances.
Have you read books by Richard Morgan? The torture scences in the Takeshi novels are some of the most detailed. As virtual reality allows them to load you into the body of pregnant women, being raped and having soldering-iron slided up your vagina. And if you die due to hours of torture, just restart the simulation. Just one of the scenes from the first book.
However, if EY converted to religion, he would (in that condition) assert that he had had good reasons for doing it, i.e. that it was rational. So he would have no reason to take down this website anyway.
You can use the wget program like this: ‘wget -m lesswrong.com’. A database download would be easier on the servers though.
I support this idea.
But what about copyright issues? What if posts and comments are owned by their writer?
I would argue that one cannot own the information stored on the computers of other, unrelated people.
I support this idea also. I actually intend to make a service for uploading the content of forum/blog to alternate server for backup service, but who knows when it will happen.
WebOffline can grab the whole thing to an iphone or ipad, formatting preserved. There are similar programs for PC/MAC