About the intersection of math and politics through the mind of a child, Bob Murphy relates this story about his six-year-old son Clark:
Clark: Daddy why can’t there be a biggest number?
Bob: Because no matter how big a number is, there is always a bigger number.
Clark (puzzled): Why?
Bob: OK, let’s say a guy comes up to me and says, “Hey, I know the biggest number!” Then I would say, “Oh yeah, what is it?” And the guy would tell me, “It’s a billion billion.” But then I would just add 1 to it, and say, “A ha, a billion billion and 1 is a bigger number. So you made a mistake when you said you thought of the biggest number.”
Clark (after a pause): What guy are you talking about?
Bob: Just any guy. I’m saying, if anybody tries to think of the biggest number, I’ll always be able to do that trick–where I add 1 to it–so they can’t do it. They’ll always lose.
Clark: What if a girl asks you?
[I ran through the same thing with a girl asking me...]
Clark: OK I want to tell the story!
Bob: Sure go ahead.
Clark: So what if a guy came up to me and said, “Hey Clark, I know the biggest number! It’s 100 billion!” Then I would say, “No, 100 billion and 1 is bigger! You’re wrong!”
Bob: Right, good job. So he didn’t really think of the biggest number after all, did he?
Clark: No.
Bob: And you can always do that.
Clark: OK let me tell it again with Sam [name possibly changed—a kid from his class].
Bob: OK.
Clark: So what if Sam came up to me and said, “Hey Clark, I know the biggest number. It’s 50 googol.” But I would say, “No Sam you’re wrong! 50 googol and 1 is bigger!” But Sam gets mad so he would start shouting and say, “I DID TOO THINK OF THE BIGGEST NUMBER CLARK!!”
And I know we’re not supposed to quote ourselves, but you rarely get an opportunity to use a line like this:
I guess you already tried explaining to Clark that the cardinality of the natural numbers is invariant under transformations of largest number proponent?
About the intersection of math and politics through the mind of a child, Bob Murphy relates this story about his six-year-old son Clark:
And I know we’re not supposed to quote ourselves, but you rarely get an opportunity to use a line like this: