Despite this witches’ brew of new technologies, a conceptual gulf remains in the futurist community between those who imagine human destiny, if any, lies in digital computers and hypothetical artificial consciousness; and in contrast radical bioconservatives who believe that our posthuman successors will also be our supersentient descendants at their neural networked core—not the digital zombies of symbolic AI run on classical serial computers.
Digital creatures need not be “zombies”—any more than human beings are—and they certainly don’t need to run on “classical serial computers”.
There is a gulf much like the one David describes—but the “bioconservative” position seems unbelievable to me—the future will be engineered.
Random question that just occurred to me: would you be fine if an exact copy was made of you (ignore quantum mechanics for now), and the old you was killed off?
I don’t know. The question of self is a hard one. I would not, because I would like my consciousness, as in the one that I control (a little recursive, but you get the point) to be alive, and because that other me is another distinct set of atoms, and therefore my neurons don’t control him. So I would say no
There might not be such a thing as “distinct set of atoms” on fundamental level and even if it does, the atoms/molecules in constellation that constitutes you are turned over all the time. In short you in 5 sec do not consist of the same set of atoms at present you. Does that make you think that 5 sec you is not really you?
Digital creatures need not be “zombies”—any more than human beings are—and they certainly don’t need to run on “classical serial computers”.
There is a gulf much like the one David describes—but the “bioconservative” position seems unbelievable to me—the future will be engineered.
Random question that just occurred to me: would you be fine if an exact copy was made of you (ignore quantum mechanics for now), and the old you was killed off?
If you asked me afterwards, I’d hardly say “no”.
Me? I suppose so—if I could be really convinced the process was reliable. Make two of me and I might need less convincing.
I don’t know. The question of self is a hard one. I would not, because I would like my consciousness, as in the one that I control (a little recursive, but you get the point) to be alive, and because that other me is another distinct set of atoms, and therefore my neurons don’t control him. So I would say no
There might not be such a thing as “distinct set of atoms” on fundamental level and even if it does, the atoms/molecules in constellation that constitutes you are turned over all the time. In short you in 5 sec do not consist of the same set of atoms at present you. Does that make you think that 5 sec you is not really you?
The five seconds in the future guy is me. The guy from 5 seconds ago… nah, he was kind of a dick.
Could I come back at say 21 with the knowledge / wisdom I have now?