If I were to take anything away from this, it’s that you can have cognition/intelligence that is efficient, or rational/unexploitable cognition like full-blown Bayesianism, but not both.
And that given the constraints of today, it is far better to have efficient cognition than rational/unexploitable cognition, because the former can actually be implemented, while the latter can’t be implemented at all.
I agree with your point in general of efficiency vs rationality, but I don’t see the direct connection to the article. Can you explain? It seems to me that a representation along correlated values is more efficient, but I don’t see how it is any less rational.
If I were to take anything away from this, it’s that you can have cognition/intelligence that is efficient, or rational/unexploitable cognition like full-blown Bayesianism, but not both.
And that given the constraints of today, it is far better to have efficient cognition than rational/unexploitable cognition, because the former can actually be implemented, while the latter can’t be implemented at all.
I agree with your point in general of efficiency vs rationality, but I don’t see the direct connection to the article. Can you explain? It seems to me that a representation along correlated values is more efficient, but I don’t see how it is any less rational.
This wasn’t specifically connected to the post, just providing general commentary.