I don’t think it’s suspicious at all. The legal tradition deliberately orders its exponents to restrict its scope to enforceable laws without too major backlashes. (I know there are legal maxims expressing these concepts, but they just aren’t coming to mind for some reason.)
EDIT: Mnemosyne popped up an example maxim: ‘Ad impossibilia nemo tenetur.’
I don’t think it’s suspicious at all. The legal tradition deliberately orders its exponents to restrict its scope to enforceable laws without too major backlashes. (I know there are legal maxims expressing these concepts, but they just aren’t coming to mind for some reason.)
EDIT: Mnemosyne popped up an example maxim: ‘Ad impossibilia nemo tenetur.’