I ask because I hypothesize that a rational theist/religious person almost definitely has to be vulnerable to Pascal’s Mugging.
I don’t see why they’d be any more vulnerable then a rationalist atheist.
Keep in mind we don’t even know how to describe a rational agent that’s not vulnerable to Pascal’s mugging.
The way we currently get around this problem is by having a rule that temporarily suspends our decision theory when we pattern match the situation to resemble Pascal’s mugging.
I don’t see why they’d be any more vulnerable then a rationalist atheist.
Keep in mind we don’t even know how to describe a rational agent that’s not vulnerable to Pascal’s mugging.
The way we currently get around this problem is by having a rule that temporarily suspends our decision theory when we pattern match the situation to resemble Pascal’s mugging.