Didn’t have one what?
And where intuitions are strong and varying, we can’t use them to decide between ethical systems.
Who didn’t have a strong intution.
The problem isn’t lack of intuitions, it’s conflict between them. Agree this makes them useless, but the effects are different—construct a general system from a mostly unrelated set of intuitions vs invalidate some intuitions.
Hmm. There’s plenty of conflict between abortion is right/wrong,. and very little between murder is right/wrong.
But plenty of conflict on what is/isn’t murder.
Current theme: default
Less Wrong (text)
Less Wrong (link)
Arrow keys: Next/previous image
Escape or click: Hide zoomed image
Space bar: Reset image size & position
Scroll to zoom in/out
(When zoomed in, drag to pan; double-click to close)
Keys shown in yellow (e.g., ]) are accesskeys, and require a browser-specific modifier key (or keys).
]
Keys shown in grey (e.g., ?) do not require any modifier keys.
?
Esc
h
f
a
m
v
c
r
q
t
u
o
,
.
/
s
n
e
;
Enter
[
\
k
i
l
=
-
0
′
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
→
↓
←
↑
Space
x
z
`
g
Didn’t have one what?
And where intuitions are strong and varying, we can’t use them to decide between ethical systems.
Who didn’t have a strong intution.
The problem isn’t lack of intuitions, it’s conflict between them. Agree this makes them useless, but the effects are different—construct a general system from a mostly unrelated set of intuitions vs invalidate some intuitions.
Hmm. There’s plenty of conflict between abortion is right/wrong,. and very little between murder is right/wrong.
But plenty of conflict on what is/isn’t murder.