Well, exactly. It’s a possible situation in the mathematical framework of who-did-what-to-whom you created. I thought of it before I thought of a reason why. For many definitions of what “who-did-what-to-whom” means, a sufficiently clever reason why would be constructed.
Maybe it must be done to prevent bad stuff.
Maybe it’s a fact of the psychology of these two individuals that one of them is going to do it.
Maybe an AI in a box is going to convince one of two people with the power to release it, to release it—this is sort of like the last one?
Well, exactly. It’s a possible situation in the mathematical framework of who-did-what-to-whom you created. I thought of it before I thought of a reason why. For many definitions of what “who-did-what-to-whom” means, a sufficiently clever reason why would be constructed.
Maybe it must be done to prevent bad stuff.
Maybe it’s a fact of the psychology of these two individuals that one of them is going to do it.
Maybe an AI in a box is going to convince one of two people with the power to release it, to release it—this is sort of like the last one?