Utilitarianism doesn’t imply consquentialism, though; you can assign utility depending on whether (sentient?) decision processes choose virtuously and implement your favorite imperative.
You mean “having a utility function”, not “utilitarianism”. The latter is generally used to mean a specific batch of consequentialist utility functions.
You mean “having a utility function”, not “utilitarianism”. The latter is generally used to mean a specific batch of consequentialist utility functions.
The latter also assumes the possibility of interpersonal utility comparison, which is not the case with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions.
You mean “having a utility function”, not “utilitarianism”. The latter is generally used to mean a specific batch of consequentialist utility functions.
The latter also assumes the possibility of interpersonal utility comparison, which is not the case with von Neumann-Morgenstern utility functions.