Also, please correct me if I am wrong, some parts of the annexed territories—from certain perspective, now a part of Russia—were already regained by Ukraine—which from that perspective means Ukraine (with the support of NATO) attacking and successfully conquering parts of Russia’s territory. And yet, no nukes so far.
My impression of the annexation is that it is a way to move the mobilized troops to the front without having to internally declare war, or break Russian law (which only allows mobilization to protect Russia, as I understand it).
As I understand, Russia declaratively annexed territories not under Russian control even at the time of declaration. This is one reason I thought nuclear border defense rhetoric was bluffing.
Also, please correct me if I am wrong, some parts of the annexed territories—from certain perspective, now a part of Russia—were already regained by Ukraine—which from that perspective means Ukraine (with the support of NATO) attacking and successfully conquering parts of Russia’s territory. And yet, no nukes so far.
My impression of the annexation is that it is a way to move the mobilized troops to the front without having to internally declare war, or break Russian law (which only allows mobilization to protect Russia, as I understand it).
As I understand, Russia declaratively annexed territories not under Russian control even at the time of declaration. This is one reason I thought nuclear border defense rhetoric was bluffing.