Sorry, this post ignores too many obviously relevant factors to be very convincing.
It makes arguments based on how it would not make sense for someone to take the risk to eliminate Epstein because they would go to jail for murder IF CAUGHT, but the fundamental thing going on with Epstein is people, even well-connected billionaires, are fully willing to do things that will send to prison IF CAUGHT because they believe (for good reason) that they will not be caught, and if caught will not be punished to the full extent of the law. So you’re already dealing with a set of people who are willing to risk going to jail to get what they want, and willing to pay other people to take on that risk to help them.
There’s also no mention of Trump or Clinton, two people that Epstein might obviously be tempted to implicate who have both direct and indirect power over the CIA and other US government agencies and who we know have few to no moral qualms about having people killed. These are also the exact people who would be in position to subvert the Attorney General or anyone else looking at the evidence.
The last time he was arrested, he subverted a ton of people to the extent that he got a relatively low level of punishment that let him spend 12 hours a day doing whatever he wanted outside of prison, zero consequences for breaking the rules (eg flying to other cities when he was supposed to stay in florida on his “work release”), and even with that he still get let out early.
In addition, the fundamental premise of the Epstein story is that dozens if not hundreds of wealthy and well-connected people have in fact been “subverted” for years into covering up or at least not making a fuss about frequent underaged sex and rape.
You can credibly claim that Epstein currently had no plans of talking, but like you said he had turned against a past co-conspirator, so you can’t credibly claim that no one who was at risk if he talked might not believe that it was a better deal to eliminate him than to worry for the next 20 years.
It makes arguments based on how it would not make sense for someone to take the risk to eliminate Epstein because they would go to jail for murder IF CAUGHT
And that they would be caught
There’s also no mention of Trump or Clinton, two people that Epstein might obviously be tempted to implicate who have both direct and indirect power over the CIA and other US government agencies
They would not have relevant control over the people who investigated Epstein’s death or an ability tot amper with he evidence I have presented or the ability to command risk-free any parties that might be able to murder Epstein.
he has enough money to bribe people to let him live a life of luxury in jail
This is not how prisons work.
or to fully stage an escape, perhaps by bribing them to let him stay in a minimum security prison, where there are frequent escapes
Also not how prisons or prison assingment works.
Being able to bribe someone is not about having “enough money” to do it. It has to be feasible as a financial transaction. You can have a billion dollars to bribe the president with and if I can’t get it to him or propose a bribery to him without being charged with bribery and the government forcing the money to be destroyed then it doesn’t work.
he subverted a ton of people to the extent that he got a relatively low level of punishment that let him spend 12 hours a day doing whatever he wanted outside of prison, zero consequences for breaking the rules (eg flying to other cities when he was supposed to stay in florida on his “work release”), and even with that he still get let out early.
Read the original post! Fully explained by my hypothesis that he was a CIA agent.
In addition, the fundamental premise of the Epstein story is that dozens if not hundreds of wealthy and well-connected people have in fact been “subverted” for years into covering up or at least not making a fuss about frequent underaged sex and rape.
Are you actually, explicitly saying that hundreds of wealthy and well-connected people have been subverted into covering up underaged sex and rape, and not just referencing a story that they were? Why? Who? Why haven’t they been implicated by Epstein’s many victims?
Sorry, this post ignores too many obviously relevant factors to be very convincing.
It makes arguments based on how it would not make sense for someone to take the risk to eliminate Epstein because they would go to jail for murder IF CAUGHT, but the fundamental thing going on with Epstein is people, even well-connected billionaires, are fully willing to do things that will send to prison IF CAUGHT because they believe (for good reason) that they will not be caught, and if caught will not be punished to the full extent of the law. So you’re already dealing with a set of people who are willing to risk going to jail to get what they want, and willing to pay other people to take on that risk to help them.
There’s also no mention of Trump or Clinton, two people that Epstein might obviously be tempted to implicate who have both direct and indirect power over the CIA and other US government agencies and who we know have few to no moral qualms about having people killed. These are also the exact people who would be in position to subvert the Attorney General or anyone else looking at the evidence.
If Epstein still has enough access to money to bribe people to let him kill himself, he has enough money to bribe people to let him live a life of luxury in jail, or to fully stage an escape, perhaps by bribing them to let him stay in a minimum security prison, where there are frequent escapes (https://apnews.com/article/government-and-politics-prisons-prison-breaks-business-c1979d6ad6e7b3531968dab0e61eb22d)
The last time he was arrested, he subverted a ton of people to the extent that he got a relatively low level of punishment that let him spend 12 hours a day doing whatever he wanted outside of prison, zero consequences for breaking the rules (eg flying to other cities when he was supposed to stay in florida on his “work release”), and even with that he still get let out early.
In addition, the fundamental premise of the Epstein story is that dozens if not hundreds of wealthy and well-connected people have in fact been “subverted” for years into covering up or at least not making a fuss about frequent underaged sex and rape.
You can credibly claim that Epstein currently had no plans of talking, but like you said he had turned against a past co-conspirator, so you can’t credibly claim that no one who was at risk if he talked might not believe that it was a better deal to eliminate him than to worry for the next 20 years.
And that they would be caught
They would not have relevant control over the people who investigated Epstein’s death or an ability tot amper with he evidence I have presented or the ability to command risk-free any parties that might be able to murder Epstein.
This is not how prisons work.
Also not how prisons or prison assingment works.
Being able to bribe someone is not about having “enough money” to do it. It has to be feasible as a financial transaction. You can have a billion dollars to bribe the president with and if I can’t get it to him or propose a bribery to him without being charged with bribery and the government forcing the money to be destroyed then it doesn’t work.
Read the original post! Fully explained by my hypothesis that he was a CIA agent.
Are you actually, explicitly saying that hundreds of wealthy and well-connected people have been subverted into covering up underaged sex and rape, and not just referencing a story that they were? Why? Who? Why haven’t they been implicated by Epstein’s many victims?