No one has explicitly said the First Amendment should apply only to journalists. But posing the question “Is X a journalist, and therefore protected by the First Amendment?” has that implication.
You should use DuckDuckGo instead of Google; I find that it gives better search results (which was surprising to me), and they don’t keep any records of your search history.
You should use Google instead of DuckDuckGo; I find that it gives better search results (which was unsurprising to me), and they keep searchable records of your search history.
Use Google, and you’ll see many people asking whether Julian Assange is a reporter, and therefore protected under the first amendment. Such as “Why Julian Assange is a journalist—And why WikiLeaks is entitled to the same First Amendment protections as the New York Times ”. And you will also find people responding to the implied argument, like Reason magazine.
No one has explicitly said the First Amendment should apply only to journalists. But posing the question “Is X a journalist, and therefore protected by the First Amendment?” has that implication.
You should use DuckDuckGo instead of Google; I find that it gives better search results (which was surprising to me), and they don’t keep any records of your search history.
You should use Google instead of DuckDuckGo; I find that it gives better search results (which was unsurprising to me), and they keep searchable records of your search history.