My looking at history is that this isn’t quite correct. It is the most restrained aggressor/tyrant who winds up getting targeted.
That may very well be the case, and if so, it’s positive evidence that Tsipursky Rage is not a relatively important factor in motivating peoples’ behavior. Which is consistent with my instincts.
That may very well be the case, and if so, it’s positive evidence that Tsipursky Rage is not a relatively important factor in motivating peoples’ behavior. Which is consistent with my instincts.