Similar ladders exist in other domains—drawing, for example. But I have not observed such hard ceilings on one’s performance in drawing. Effective training seems far more important. The same goes for routine physics, entrepreneurship and foreign languages.
I like where you are going with #10. Perhaps it could condensed into “informatic creativity”.
Yes, I think evolutionary processes are the only generator of meaningful novelty, and this is also key to the nearly always neglected question of “hypothesis generation” in discussions of “the” scientific method.
Similar ladders exist in other domains—drawing, for example. But I have not observed such hard ceilings on one’s performance in drawing. Effective training seems far more important. The same goes for routine physics, entrepreneurship and foreign languages.
I like where you are going with #10. Perhaps it could condensed into “informatic creativity”.
Yes, I think evolutionary processes are the only generator of meaningful novelty, and this is also key to the nearly always neglected question of “hypothesis generation” in discussions of “the” scientific method.