This wasn’t him taking a stance. It ends with a question, and it’s not a rhetorical question, he doesn’t have a formed stance. Putting him in a position where he feels the need to defend a thought he just shat out about a topic he doesn’t care about while drinking a beer is very bad discourse.
true virtual reality requires not just speakers in your ears and tv in your eyes, but also good input at the speed of thought. maybe it’s just eye, face, hand, and limb tracking. but idk, i feel like headsets have still not found their mouse and keyboard. the input is so … low bandwidth? maybe Apple will figure it out, or maybe we need to revive Xerox back from the grave
you know those lists about historical examples of notable people mistakenly saying that some tech will not be useful (for example)
Elon Musk saying that VR is just a TV on your nose will probably become one of those ^^
https://youtube.com/shorts/wYeGVStouqw?feature=share
This wasn’t him taking a stance. It ends with a question, and it’s not a rhetorical question, he doesn’t have a formed stance. Putting him in a position where he feels the need to defend a thought he just shat out about a topic he doesn’t care about while drinking a beer is very bad discourse.
ok that’s fair yeah! thanks for your reply. I’m guessing a lot of those historical quotes are also taking out of context actually.
I believe VR/AR are not going to be as big of a deal as smartphones85%, and not produce >$200 bio. of revenue in 203055%.
earbuds are just speakers in your ears. they’re also way better than speakers.
true virtual reality requires not just speakers in your ears and tv in your eyes, but also good input at the speed of thought. maybe it’s just eye, face, hand, and limb tracking. but idk, i feel like headsets have still not found their mouse and keyboard. the input is so … low bandwidth? maybe Apple will figure it out, or maybe we need to revive Xerox back from the grave