Fourth!
And I still managed to miss it the first three times.
I thought I did a search but apparently not; sorry.
In the long run, it’s all good—I think it’s a decent paper, and I suppose this way more eyeballs see it than if I was the only one to post it. (Not to say that we should make a regular habit of linking things four times :-)
Fourth!
And I still managed to miss it the first three times.
I thought I did a search but apparently not; sorry.
In the long run, it’s all good—I think it’s a decent paper, and I suppose this way more eyeballs see it than if I was the only one to post it. (Not to say that we should make a regular habit of linking things four times :-)