You admit that Copenhagen is unsatisfactory but it is useful for education. I don’t see any reason not to teach MWI in the same vein.
Because it sets people up to think that QM can be understood in terms of wavefunctions that exist and contain parallel realities; yet when the time comes to calculate anything, you have to go back to Copenhagen and employ the Born rule.
Also, real physics is about operator algebras of observables. Again, this is something you don’t get from pure Schrodinger dynamics.
QM should be taught in the Copenhagen framework, and then there should be some review of proposed ontologies and their problems.
Because it sets people up to think that QM can be understood in terms of wavefunctions that exist and contain parallel realities; yet when the time comes to calculate anything, you have to go back to Copenhagen and employ the Born rule.
Also, real physics is about operator algebras of observables. Again, this is something you don’t get from pure Schrodinger dynamics.
QM should be taught in the Copenhagen framework, and then there should be some review of proposed ontologies and their problems.