Yeah, this is an important subject. I’ll probably read your paper.
I’ve found a fairly simple and apparently workable solution
To what, exactly?
I fixed the second paragraph. I meant a “solution” to the challenge posed by the Hacking/White “inverse gambler’s fallacy” argument, basically just an account of where exactly the argument goes wrong.
Yeah, this is an important subject. I’ll probably read your paper.
To what, exactly?
I fixed the second paragraph. I meant a “solution” to the challenge posed by the Hacking/White “inverse gambler’s fallacy” argument, basically just an account of where exactly the argument goes wrong.