I’m not sure this is very rational. Assuming that you are more competent than you really are—which seems to be a matter of hubris—is indeed capable of destroying you.
I think the way it works is that people are built to have hubris for signalling purposes, and then they’re built to be lazy and risk-averse to counter the dangers of hubris. If you don’t get rid of risk-aversion and akrasia but you do get rid of hubris, that can be problematic.
I’m not sure this is very rational. Assuming that you are more competent than you really are—which seems to be a matter of hubris—is indeed capable of destroying you.
Yes, but more favorable outcomes are also possible, like becoming the [e.g. 43rd] President.
I think the way it works is that people are built to have hubris for signalling purposes, and then they’re built to be lazy and risk-averse to counter the dangers of hubris. If you don’t get rid of risk-aversion and akrasia but you do get rid of hubris, that can be problematic.