Definitely relevant, but not sure if it supports my argument that we shouldn’t try to induce collapse.
This post is about unilaterally taking a very radical action to avert a potentially worse scenario that inertia and race dynamics are pushing us towards. That looks like classic ‘unilateralist’s benediction’ territory.
What ofer’s saying is that collapse plans are probably a unilateralist curse, since one agent is taking dangerous decisions on their own, because one agent perceives the benefit to be high relative to risk.
Relevant & important: The unilateralist’s curse.
Definitely relevant, but not sure if it supports my argument that we shouldn’t try to induce collapse.
This post is about unilaterally taking a very radical action to avert a potentially worse scenario that inertia and race dynamics are pushing us towards. That looks like classic ‘unilateralist’s benediction’ territory.
What ofer’s saying is that collapse plans are probably a unilateralist curse, since one agent is taking dangerous decisions on their own, because one agent perceives the benefit to be high relative to risk.