People have good intuitions for why the traits (polite, liberal, helpful) will have massive Kolmogorov complexity but the valences won’t.
But the correct mechanistic explanation must actually appeal to what I call “semiotic complexity”.
Now, there a missing step to formally connect the two notions of complexity in a quantitative way. However, in the limit they should be equal up to a factor O(1) because story-telling is Turing-complete.
Maybe that constant factor messes up the explanation, but I think that’s unlikely.
People have good intuitions for why the traits (polite, liberal, helpful) will have massive Kolmogorov complexity but the valences won’t.
But the correct mechanistic explanation must actually appeal to what I call “semiotic complexity”.
Now, there a missing step to formally connect the two notions of complexity in a quantitative way. However, in the limit they should be equal up to a factor O(1) because story-telling is Turing-complete.
Maybe that constant factor messes up the explanation, but I think that’s unlikely.