Huh. I’m surprised that after finding significant changes on well-validated psychological instruments in the 2015 study, CFAR didn’t incorporate these instruments into their pre- / post-workshop assessments.
Also surprised that they dropped them from the 2017 impact analysis.
The 2017 impact analysis seems to be EA safety focused. When their theory of impact is about EA safety it’s plausible to me that this made analysis by standard metrics less important for them.
Huh. I’m surprised that after finding significant changes on well-validated psychological instruments in the 2015 study, CFAR didn’t incorporate these instruments into their pre- / post-workshop assessments.
Also surprised that they dropped them from the 2017 impact analysis.
The 2017 impact analysis seems to be EA safety focused. When their theory of impact is about EA safety it’s plausible to me that this made analysis by standard metrics less important for them.
Do you mean “AI safety focused”?