Note that I don’t endorse that page I linked to, it’s just the best source I could find for definitions of “improved Condorcet” methods.
“U/A” is some strange class of voting scenarios where voters have a clear a priori idea about what is “unacceptable” versus “acceptable” and strategize accordingly. I don’t think it’s analytically very helpful.
I see. I figured U/A meant something like that. I think it’s potentially useful to consider that case, but I wouldn’t design a system entirely around it.
Note that I don’t endorse that page I linked to, it’s just the best source I could find for definitions of “improved Condorcet” methods.
“U/A” is some strange class of voting scenarios where voters have a clear a priori idea about what is “unacceptable” versus “acceptable” and strategize accordingly. I don’t think it’s analytically very helpful.
I see. I figured U/A meant something like that. I think it’s potentially useful to consider that case, but I wouldn’t design a system entirely around it.