Referring to AIs that want to kill humans as simply “unfriendly”.
That seems entirely legitimate. … AIs that want to kill humans (ie. most of them) are unfriendly.
I interpreted lessdazed as objecting to the lack of emotional impact—calling it “unfriendly artificial intelligence” has a certain blasé quality, particularly when compared to “all-powerful abomination bent on our destruction”, say.
I interpreted lessdazed as objecting to the lack of emotional impact—calling it “unfriendly artificial intelligence” has a certain blasé quality, particularly when compared to “all-powerful abomination bent on our destruction”, say.
Edit: Apparently I was incorrect.