If you can have a 95% confidence interval, why can’t you have a >50% confidence interval as well?
50% confidence intervals are standard practice. But not the point and not what I questioned.
There is no way in which my comment can be read which would make your reply make sense in the context.
If you can have a 95% confidence interval, why can’t you have a >50% confidence interval as well?
50% confidence intervals are standard practice. But not the point and not what I questioned.
There is no way in which my comment can be read which would make your reply make sense in the context.