What are you talking about?
The problem is not so much the lack of a definition as the lack of a method.
You seem to have posted a link to Yudowsky musings about ‘CEV’ collected together in pdf form?
What relation does this have to the prior comment?
That document is the thing Yudkowdky published in 2004 when he originally defined and explained the term. If you have questions not answered by the document’s fairly detailed breakdown of CEV you should just ask them instead of being cheeky.
Have you read it?
The pdf document linked clearly contains personal musings.
If you are unaware of what scientists proposing and adopting definitions looks like then you can search it up.
ACM, IEEE, Physical review Letters, etc., all have examples viewable online.
What are you talking about?
The problem is not so much the lack of a definition as the lack of a method.
You seem to have posted a link to Yudowsky musings about ‘CEV’ collected together in pdf form?
What relation does this have to the prior comment?
That document is the thing Yudkowdky published in 2004 when he originally defined and explained the term. If you have questions not answered by the document’s fairly detailed breakdown of CEV you should just ask them instead of being cheeky.
Have you read it?
The pdf document linked clearly contains personal musings.
If you are unaware of what scientists proposing and adopting definitions looks like then you can search it up.
ACM, IEEE, Physical review Letters, etc., all have examples viewable online.