Why do people post that a “meta argument”—as they call it—would be cheating? How can there be cheating? Anything the AI says is fair game. Would a transhuman AI restrict itself from possible paths to victory merely because it might be considered “cheating?”
The “meta argument” claim completely misses the point of the game and—to my mind—somehow resembles observers trying to turn a set of arguments that might win into out of bounds rules.
Why do people post that a “meta argument”—as they call it—would be cheating? How can there be cheating? Anything the AI says is fair game. Would a transhuman AI restrict itself from possible paths to victory merely because it might be considered “cheating?”
The “meta argument” claim completely misses the point of the game and—to my mind—somehow resembles observers trying to turn a set of arguments that might win into out of bounds rules.