I also find it… ironic that Bill Gates is missing from your list.
I thought about him, but it seems “too obvious”(?). Like I’d think that it’s sort of clear that he has a solid chance at running and winning if he wanted to. But he doesn’t, so I take that as evidence that he doesn’t want to. Although I didn’t think much about it, and it very well may be bad reasoning.
it’s sort of clear that he has a solid chance at running and winning if he wanted to.
Really? Have you asked any “regular” people—cashiers in a Walmart, car mechanics, secretaries—whether they think Bill “Why isn’t my computer doing what I want?” Gates would make a good POTUS..?
But the ironic part actually has to do with Gates demonstrating much more altruism than other names on your list.
I thought about him, but it seems “too obvious”(?). Like I’d think that it’s sort of clear that he has a solid chance at running and winning if he wanted to. But he doesn’t, so I take that as evidence that he doesn’t want to. Although I didn’t think much about it, and it very well may be bad reasoning.
Really? Have you asked any “regular” people—cashiers in a Walmart, car mechanics, secretaries—whether they think Bill “Why isn’t my computer doing what I want?” Gates would make a good POTUS..?
But the ironic part actually has to do with Gates demonstrating much more altruism than other names on your list.
I think you’re right. My previous comment was just what my original thought process was, but now I think you’re right.