Quirrell values Harry—at least instrumentally, for purposes as yet uncertain, and possibly emotionally (if he is capable of valuing a person in that way). He is too valuable to kill except as a last resort, and Quirrell’s actions suggest that he thinks he can avert the prophecy and make the killing unnecessary (otherwise he would not be taking all the measures he is currently taking).
As for not informing others of the prophecy, doubtless he feels that whatever (frantic and desperate) actions they might take in response would interfere with his own much more intelligent attempt to resolve the situation.
That’s fair enough, but I just thought of one more thing that Quirrell could do that he’s choosing not to… Why isn’t Quirrell doing the star thing again, or at least offering to do so?
However, Harry would probably reject it the way he rejected Fawkes’s song—he doesn’t want to be freed or distracted from his pain, since he considers it the proper and correct response to the death of his best friend. He may also believe that it’s powering his dark side, and thus helping him look for ways to save Hermione.
It’s possible that he would reject it, yes, but I don’t think it’s that easy to compare it to Fawkes’ song. If memory serves, phoenix songs actually change one’s mood; the stars wouldn’t do that, just comfort him. And, even if Harry does reject it, it’s unlikely to cost Quirrell anything to make the offer.
Showing Harry the stars at this point would probably kill him. The image of the stars is a talisman to him, representing the necessary triumph of human will over death. Harry has just made a resolution to unmake death, and we know he can do it because of Trelawney’s prophecy. The next time he sees that image he is going to act on his resolution if he hasn’t already, and right now he’s exhausted and confused and desperately unhappy… He needs to be rested.
And besides, given that Quirrell thinks that Harry will destroy the world when he acts on his resolution, he should be diverting Harry’s attention from the stars at all costs, and trying to bind him more strongly to the Earth and the people on it, which he is doing. I’m loving the irony of Voldemort desperately trying to remind Harry of all the people who love him.
Mind you, whilst I think Quirrell is smart enough to not show Harry the stars given what he knows, I could be wrong. So maybe he will try that at some point and it will blow up in his face.
EDIT: Hmm, prediction failed. I guess this means that I’m more swayed by emotion than Harry. No surprises there.
I do kinda feel like “Snape asked for advice on understanding a prophecy; the defense professor should consider it.” Except I’m sure Quirell doesn’t view anyone else as smart enough to be any better at it than him, except possibly Harry/Snape/Dumbledore, except (A) not really and (B) he doesn’t trust any of them with the prophecy, I’m sure.
Quirrell values Harry—at least instrumentally, for purposes as yet uncertain, and possibly emotionally (if he is capable of valuing a person in that way). He is too valuable to kill except as a last resort, and Quirrell’s actions suggest that he thinks he can avert the prophecy and make the killing unnecessary (otherwise he would not be taking all the measures he is currently taking).
As for not informing others of the prophecy, doubtless he feels that whatever (frantic and desperate) actions they might take in response would interfere with his own much more intelligent attempt to resolve the situation.
That’s fair enough, but I just thought of one more thing that Quirrell could do that he’s choosing not to… Why isn’t Quirrell doing the star thing again, or at least offering to do so?
That… is an extremely sensible thing to do.
However, Harry would probably reject it the way he rejected Fawkes’s song—he doesn’t want to be freed or distracted from his pain, since he considers it the proper and correct response to the death of his best friend. He may also believe that it’s powering his dark side, and thus helping him look for ways to save Hermione.
It’s possible that he would reject it, yes, but I don’t think it’s that easy to compare it to Fawkes’ song. If memory serves, phoenix songs actually change one’s mood; the stars wouldn’t do that, just comfort him. And, even if Harry does reject it, it’s unlikely to cost Quirrell anything to make the offer.
Showing Harry the stars at this point would probably kill him. The image of the stars is a talisman to him, representing the necessary triumph of human will over death. Harry has just made a resolution to unmake death, and we know he can do it because of Trelawney’s prophecy. The next time he sees that image he is going to act on his resolution if he hasn’t already, and right now he’s exhausted and confused and desperately unhappy… He needs to be rested.
And besides, given that Quirrell thinks that Harry will destroy the world when he acts on his resolution, he should be diverting Harry’s attention from the stars at all costs, and trying to bind him more strongly to the Earth and the people on it, which he is doing. I’m loving the irony of Voldemort desperately trying to remind Harry of all the people who love him.
Mind you, whilst I think Quirrell is smart enough to not show Harry the stars given what he knows, I could be wrong. So maybe he will try that at some point and it will blow up in his face.
EDIT: Hmm, prediction failed. I guess this means that I’m more swayed by emotion than Harry. No surprises there.
I do kinda feel like “Snape asked for advice on understanding a prophecy; the defense professor should consider it.” Except I’m sure Quirell doesn’t view anyone else as smart enough to be any better at it than him, except possibly Harry/Snape/Dumbledore, except (A) not really and (B) he doesn’t trust any of them with the prophecy, I’m sure.