I like this idea a lot. I think some elaboration might be necessary to remove possible system-gaming scenarios, though.
For example, imagine a collusion between an accountant who can manipulate the books and a “whisteblower” employee. If the accountant could alter the books without it being traced back to them, then they could arrange to split the settlement and win big, at the expense of the rest of the corporation.
I like this idea a lot. I think some elaboration might be necessary to remove possible system-gaming scenarios, though.
For example, imagine a collusion between an accountant who can manipulate the books and a “whisteblower” employee. If the accountant could alter the books without it being traced back to them, then they could arrange to split the settlement and win big, at the expense of the rest of the corporation.
Nick Szabo has written some about “group controls”, which are (I believe) the state of the art for achieving Friendly organizations:
http://szabo.best.vwh.net/groupcontrols.html