suggesting that this got to the heart of Truth. Without any explicit mention of either correspondence or facts, I’ve always thought of this as a deflationary theory.
To understand whether a belief is true, we need (only) to understand what possible states of the world would make it true or false, and then ask directly about the world.
That is from the LW entry on truth. Pretty clearly correspondence if you ask me.
Peircian as in pragmatist? I always thought EY was a correspondence theorist with a hint of redundancy theory.
He’s written stuff like
suggesting that this got to the heart of Truth. Without any explicit mention of either correspondence or facts, I’ve always thought of this as a deflationary theory.
That is from the LW entry on truth. Pretty clearly correspondence if you ask me.