For example, there’s at least one country that has made quite a history invading other countries, for made up reasons.
That country also has a history of threating to use nuclear weapons. It also worrisome that it’s executive has a history of lying to it’s population and it’s legislative to make it easier for a generals to lunch nuclear weapons.
It is worrisome indeed. I would say, it definitely does not help and only increases a risk. However, I don’t think this country-that-must-not-be-named would start the nuclear war first, simply because it has too much to lose and its non-nuclear opportunities are excellent. This may change in future—so yes, there is some probability as well.
That country also has a history of threating to use nuclear weapons. It also worrisome that it’s executive has a history of lying to it’s population and it’s legislative to make it easier for a generals to lunch nuclear weapons.
It is worrisome indeed. I would say, it definitely does not help and only increases a risk. However, I don’t think this country-that-must-not-be-named would start the nuclear war first, simply because it has too much to lose and its non-nuclear opportunities are excellent. This may change in future—so yes, there is some probability as well.