On moral realism… Physics causes all realities so if we’re saying some phenomenon is objectively bad then we’re saying Physics is objectively bad. But saying physics is objectively bad is meaningless.
Alright, based on your phrasing I had thought it was something you believed. I’m open to moral realism and I don’t immediately see how phenomena being objectively bad would imply that physics is objectively bad.
On moral realism… Physics causes all realities so if we’re saying some phenomenon is objectively bad then we’re saying Physics is objectively bad. But saying physics is objectively bad is meaningless.
Consider moral constructivism.
Why does something causing something bad make that thing itself bad?
you’d have to ask a moral realist. but i think they would say hitler caused the holocaust so hitler is bad.
Alright, based on your phrasing I had thought it was something you believed. I’m open to moral realism and I don’t immediately see how phenomena being objectively bad would imply that physics is objectively bad.