From my point of view, that’s missing the central point quite badly.
Could you let me know why? What about consciousness is missed by a purely behavioral description of an object (keeping in mind that what I mean by behavior is very broad, and includes things like the behavior of electrical signals)?
It’s not intended to be a complete definition of consciousness, just a nudge away from behaviourism.
From my point of view, that’s missing the central point quite badly.
And elsewhere that they are metaphysically impossible.
Could you let me know why? What about consciousness is missed by a purely behavioral description of an object (keeping in mind that what I mean by behavior is very broad, and includes things like the behavior of electrical signals)?
What is missed is the way it seems from the inside,as I pointed out originally. I don’t have to put my head into an FMRI to know that I am conscious.