Label the rule producing the order A < B < C as “moral.”
As a way of explaining “The Meaning of Right” that is pretty unhelpful. EY says the true morality is a blob of computation that doens’t vary between persons. But it is capable of varying from other blobs of computation. So is calling that particular computation Moral the recognition of a pre-existing fact about it, or the stipulation of a meaning for the word “morality”?
Likewise—is the label a recognition (not abitrary) , or a stipulation that is arbitrary at the point that it is made.
As a way of explaining “The Meaning of Right” that is pretty unhelpful. EY says the true morality is a blob of computation that doens’t vary between persons. But it is capable of varying from other blobs of computation. So is calling that particular computation Moral the recognition of a pre-existing fact about it, or the stipulation of a meaning for the word “morality”?
Likewise—is the label a recognition (not abitrary) , or a stipulation that is arbitrary at the point that it is made.