I say that because I am a philosopher of science. It’s a meta-political claim not a political claim.
You’re a philosopher of science?
Yeah, I was thrown off by that too. I always thought he was a potato.
I endorse the distinction between policies and meta policies, which I think is the only place I disagree with prase.
However, this is an extremely awkward way to say that. Specifically, I don’t understand the first sentence.
I say that because I am a philosopher of science. It’s a meta-political claim not a political claim.
You’re a philosopher of science?
Yeah, I was thrown off by that too. I always thought he was a potato.
I endorse the distinction between policies and meta policies, which I think is the only place I disagree with prase.
However, this is an extremely awkward way to say that. Specifically, I don’t understand the first sentence.