I would prefer for people to look up Plato’s question in the first place. The same applies to futarchy, I don’t like summarizing things in texts I respect when i can reference them just as well, and possibly provide them with a second read.
Sounds condescending and isn’t helpful. If you want to communicate an idea, you, not the reader, have the onus to pass the point through. Futarchy isn’t a well-known concept. Such things have to be either explained or omitted, whether you like it or not. You should at least introduce it by a short sentence like “there was a similar proposal named Futarchy introduced by Hanson”.
Sounds condescending and isn’t helpful. If you want to communicate an idea, you, not the reader, have the onus to pass the point through. Futarchy isn’t a well-known concept. Such things have to be either explained or omitted, whether you like it or not. You should at least introduce it by a short sentence like “there was a similar proposal named Futarchy introduced by Hanson”.
You’re right. Updated.