But I’d say that posts with exactly one problem are fine for LW and correctable. The problems arise when politics causes someone to make at least five or so errors in a few sentences, and then the idea is so confounded that it is hard to tell which three errors attributed to him constitutes a charitable reading or best reconstruction of something resembling the original idea.
One should be possible to tell when one’s political opponents are making only one error—if one can find such a case to begin with.
Very good.
But I’d say that posts with exactly one problem are fine for LW and correctable. The problems arise when politics causes someone to make at least five or so errors in a few sentences, and then the idea is so confounded that it is hard to tell which three errors attributed to him constitutes a charitable reading or best reconstruction of something resembling the original idea.
One should be possible to tell when one’s political opponents are making only one error—if one can find such a case to begin with.