Speaking for myself, if this article makes any sense at all, you did a bad job communicating the idea. I canât argue against an idea, if I do not understand what the idea is, or even whether there actually is an idea.
Itâs not the job of the platform to figure out what a difficult to understand post means; itâs the job of the author to make sure the post is understandable (and relevant and insightful).
I donât understand what the post is trying to say (and Iâm also appalled by the capslock in the title). Thatâs more than enough reason to downvote, which I would have done if I hadnât figured that enough other people would do so, anyway.
i want to explain the foundation of cause and effect, namely logical consequences, which are not just the commonly known logical consequences that fall into the category of cause and effect.
instead, these are logical consequences that are truly separate from cause and effect because they form the basis.
Thatâs the essential information. if itâs not fully understood, itâs okay, but at least you grasp that there are âlogical consequencesâ different from the commonly known ones.
Downvoted without explanation, is not a rebuttal at all, not intellectual disagreement but subjective haste đ
Downvote is a signal âless of thisâ.
Speaking for myself, if this article makes any sense at all, you did a bad job communicating the idea. I canât argue against an idea, if I do not understand what the idea is, or even whether there actually is an idea.
âless of thisâ is true less reply as it should be
you can try to point on specific paragraph or line to discuss it?
if you know the âdoesnât make senseâ part of it, then you must be able to show us where those parts.
otherwise there must be wrong communication between us, i donât know where side
any way objectively, youâre not speaking for yourself, thanks for your comment
we can breakdown our discussion in days or weeks, it is okay to clarify the ambiguous for days, since lesswrong not a get smart quick schemes.
itâs a gradual process. otherwise, this is really âhugewrongâ not just lesswrong
Itâs not the job of the platform to figure out what a difficult to understand post means; itâs the job of the author to make sure the post is understandable (and relevant and insightful).
I donât understand what the post is trying to say (and Iâm also appalled by the capslock in the title). Thatâs more than enough reason to downvote, which I would have done if I hadnât figured that enough other people would do so, anyway.
yes true, not the job for âlesswrongâ, but job for ours to reflect âlesswrongâ by being patient , less hasty
okay now perhaps we will discuss,
i want to explain the foundation of cause and effect, namely logical consequences, which are not just the commonly known logical consequences that fall into the category of cause and effect.
instead, these are logical consequences that are truly separate from cause and effect because they form the basis.
Thatâs the essential information. if itâs not fully understood, itâs okay, but at least you grasp that there are âlogical consequencesâ different from the commonly known ones.