When I hear about the exploits of other LessWrongers, I wonder if Less Wrong itself isn’t also a very weird alliance we’ve simply gotten used to.
I’ve been toying with writing a post on unlikely alliances and tolerance of deviant behaviour, but I figure if I wait long enough, Scott will write exactly the same post on Slate Star Codex, only much better than I could.
My imaginary post would be about how Less Wrong celebrates deviant behaviour, ostensibly as a search process for useful life-enhancing interventions, but also because we just seem to like weird stuff and have complicated relationships with social norms.
Other communities also like weird stuff and have complicated relationships with social norms. It’s often different weird stuff and different social norms, but I wonder if there isn’t room for something interesting to happen here.
I wonder if Less Wrong itself isn’t also a very weird alliance we’ve simply gotten used to.
Well, of course. Off the top of my head, we have here a mix of the x-risk people, EAs, the polyamory tribe, and a set of logico-philosophical puzzles geeks.
When I hear about the exploits of other LessWrongers, I wonder if Less Wrong itself isn’t also a very weird alliance we’ve simply gotten used to.
I’ve been toying with writing a post on unlikely alliances and tolerance of deviant behaviour, but I figure if I wait long enough, Scott will write exactly the same post on Slate Star Codex, only much better than I could.
I expect Will_Newsome’s post on taking ideas seriously might give you most of an explanation for that.
My imaginary post would be about how Less Wrong celebrates deviant behaviour, ostensibly as a search process for useful life-enhancing interventions, but also because we just seem to like weird stuff and have complicated relationships with social norms.
Other communities also like weird stuff and have complicated relationships with social norms. It’s often different weird stuff and different social norms, but I wonder if there isn’t room for something interesting to happen here.
Well, of course. Off the top of my head, we have here a mix of the x-risk people, EAs, the polyamory tribe, and a set of logico-philosophical puzzles geeks.
Not to mention the bizarre political landscape.