Yes, though the total latency of the system becomes the sum across all N members. For large groups (my chorus is 60+ people) that may end up being prohibitive just for cases where e.g. the feedback giver wants to pause the singing and give some feedback. I’m honestly not sure, this is all quite speculative. Thank you for sparking some thoughts though!
I wonder if conductor → (strongest singer in every section) → (everyone else) → (feedback giver) would be a good compromise? Latency isn’t too high, but people are also hearing their leaders.
If you do it as a bucket brigade instead of a fanout then person N can listen to N-1 earlier people as they play: https://www.jefftk.com/p/series-singing
Yes, though the total latency of the system becomes the sum across all N members. For large groups (my chorus is 60+ people) that may end up being prohibitive just for cases where e.g. the feedback giver wants to pause the singing and give some feedback. I’m honestly not sure, this is all quite speculative. Thank you for sparking some thoughts though!
I wonder if conductor → (strongest singer in every section) → (everyone else) → (feedback giver) would be a good compromise? Latency isn’t too high, but people are also hearing their leaders.
Yes that does seem like it would be a good compromise.