I didn’t say that it was the person that had rancid oils that was sensitive.
Using the words ‘soap junkie’ seems like a deliberate attempt to reframe this issue. We do have hundreds of millions of people that do shower and use soap daily, and have for years, without their skin peeling off.
I would rather see people err on the side of stinking less, and this is easier to do with soap.
I suspect there are actually good reasons for the disagreement here. I believe a large proportion (relative to the population) of people on LW have Asperger’s Syndrome. Skin conditions and sensitivity are often comorbid symptoms of AS, so it would seem likely that the negative effects that soap can have would be more likely to show up in $RandomLessWronger than $RandomPerson.
In my own case, most soaps and deodorants irritate my skin enormously, but I’ve found particular ones that don’t, and I use very little of them to be on the safe side, while still using enough to keep myself clean and non-stinking.
I didn’t say that it was the person that had rancid oils that was sensitive.
I didn’t claim you did, nor did anything I say rely on that assumption.
without their skin peeling off.
Or that one.
Using the words ‘soap junkie’ seems like a deliberate attempt to reframe this issue.
I explicitly reject the way you are trying to frame the issue. In particular trying to frame it as ’advocating stinking more vs stinking less” as you do below is misleading in the extreme:
I would rather see people err on the side of stinking less, and this is easier to do with soap.
You are mistaken about the most effective way to prevent unseemly body odour. There is not the slightest hint of disagreement about whether or not stinking is a good thing.
Edit: Ahh, I see. The second irrelevant part makes sense as a reply to knb in the sibling.
I’m not arguing effectiveness, simply ease of use. A simple daily routine is much more resilient to schedule interruptions, and it’s important to have this be as easy as possible.
I do not believe I am advocating a complicated routine either. A rough face washer (or more specialized substitute) vs soap. Time difference and complication should be minimal.
Soap isn’t that bad. It’s not going to make that much difference either way if people prefer it. But that’s just the point—it isn’t important. (Deodorant is, for most people.)
Ah, I seem to have conflated your argument with the one that you linked to, referenced on Overcoming Bias, that suggests ‘sans douche’ days. For someone trying to internalize the practice of being clean, skipping days seems detrimental. I didn’t write this for the people that already know these things, but rather for the people that find them a mystery.
I didn’t say that it was the person that had rancid oils that was sensitive.
Using the words ‘soap junkie’ seems like a deliberate attempt to reframe this issue. We do have hundreds of millions of people that do shower and use soap daily, and have for years, without their skin peeling off.
I would rather see people err on the side of stinking less, and this is easier to do with soap.
I suspect there are actually good reasons for the disagreement here. I believe a large proportion (relative to the population) of people on LW have Asperger’s Syndrome. Skin conditions and sensitivity are often comorbid symptoms of AS, so it would seem likely that the negative effects that soap can have would be more likely to show up in $RandomLessWronger than $RandomPerson. In my own case, most soaps and deodorants irritate my skin enormously, but I’ve found particular ones that don’t, and I use very little of them to be on the safe side, while still using enough to keep myself clean and non-stinking.
I didn’t claim you did, nor did anything I say rely on that assumption.
Or that one.
I explicitly reject the way you are trying to frame the issue. In particular trying to frame it as ’advocating stinking more vs stinking less” as you do below is misleading in the extreme:
You are mistaken about the most effective way to prevent unseemly body odour. There is not the slightest hint of disagreement about whether or not stinking is a good thing.
Edit: Ahh, I see. The second irrelevant part makes sense as a reply to knb in the sibling.
I’m not arguing effectiveness, simply ease of use. A simple daily routine is much more resilient to schedule interruptions, and it’s important to have this be as easy as possible.
I do not believe I am advocating a complicated routine either. A rough face washer (or more specialized substitute) vs soap. Time difference and complication should be minimal.
Soap isn’t that bad. It’s not going to make that much difference either way if people prefer it. But that’s just the point—it isn’t important. (Deodorant is, for most people.)
Ah, I seem to have conflated your argument with the one that you linked to, referenced on Overcoming Bias, that suggests ‘sans douche’ days. For someone trying to internalize the practice of being clean, skipping days seems detrimental. I didn’t write this for the people that already know these things, but rather for the people that find them a mystery.
I definitely don’t recommend that. That’s crazy. I can’t see any benefit for occasional not bathing. Daily (or twice daily) is so much simpler.