It’s worth that noting that Nasaleze is around for over a decade and the website advertises “Nasaleze products are an all-natural formula that do NOT contain antihistamines, steroids or oxymetazoline and have no known side effects.”
This suggests that either Taffix or Nasaleze is a low cost way to cut down on infection risk.
Given that these are all basically the same thing, it looks like what you’re paying extra for with Taffix is the field-testing against Covid.
I’m completely fine with paying money to people who run crucial studies to fight COVID-19 to reward them for their research efforts when those result in me getting risk reduction.
It’s really frustrating that the paper has no control group and they inexplicably only had 52 people in the study. Maybe I’m crazy, but when I see an underpowered study design, it makes me assume the product doesn’t work. Companies with working products don’t need to run sketchy studies..
Preventing airborne infection with an intranasal cellulose powder formulation (Nasaleze Travel®) is an interesting paper.
It’s worth that noting that Nasaleze is around for over a decade and the website advertises “Nasaleze products are an all-natural formula that do NOT contain antihistamines, steroids or oxymetazoline and have no known side effects.”
This suggests that either Taffix or Nasaleze is a low cost way to cut down on infection risk.
I’m completely fine with paying money to people who run crucial studies to fight COVID-19 to reward them for their research efforts when those result in me getting risk reduction.
It’s really frustrating that the paper has no control group and they inexplicably only had 52 people in the study. Maybe I’m crazy, but when I see an underpowered study design, it makes me assume the product doesn’t work. Companies with working products don’t need to run sketchy studies..