This is a simple question that is in need of a simple answer.
Because $1,000 is greater than $0, $1,001,000 is greater than $1,000,000 and those are the kind of comparisons that CDT cares about.
Please don’t link to pages and pages of theorycrafting. Thank you.
You haven’t seemed to respond to the ‘simple’ thus far and have instead defied it aggressively. That leaves you either reading the theory or staying confused.
Because $1,000 is greater than $0, $1,001,000 is greater than $1,000,000 and those are the kind of comparisons that CDT cares about.
… which means that CDT doesn’t play Newcomb, because there are no $1,001,000 or $0 in Newcomb.
You haven’t seemed to respond to the ‘simple’ thus far and have instead defied it aggressively. That leaves you either reading the theory or staying confused.
I have never said that CDT one-boxes in Newcomb, and I don’t feel very confused right now. In fact the very first reply I got fully answered my question. I have edited my top level post, please refer to that if you feel the need to discuss this further.
We can see that. That’s why neither simple explanations nor theorycrafting have all that much chance of being understood.
I have edited my top level post, please refer to that if you feel the need to discuss this further.
If it seemed like the top level post wasn’t going to be downvoted below visibility I would have to respond to it in order to prevent muddled thinking from spreading.
Because $1,000 is greater than $0, $1,001,000 is greater than $1,000,000 and those are the kind of comparisons that CDT cares about.
You haven’t seemed to respond to the ‘simple’ thus far and have instead defied it aggressively. That leaves you either reading the theory or staying confused.
… which means that CDT doesn’t play Newcomb, because there are no $1,001,000 or $0 in Newcomb.
I have never said that CDT one-boxes in Newcomb, and I don’t feel very confused right now. In fact the very first reply I got fully answered my question. I have edited my top level post, please refer to that if you feel the need to discuss this further.
We can see that. That’s why neither simple explanations nor theorycrafting have all that much chance of being understood.
If it seemed like the top level post wasn’t going to be downvoted below visibility I would have to respond to it in order to prevent muddled thinking from spreading.