I think that this post has a certain quality, that unusual for LW.
I think ‘obvious’ is a word that not bad, but it’s not perfect for naming that quality. Do you have a better suggestion for naming that quality?
You may not have meant it, but I take this to be high praise. I’ve recently been trying to expand out of the thinking framework engendered by LW.
Perhaps, “clarificatory”, “definitional”, “retrospectively obvious”, “frameworking”?
Given that I wrote probably a dozen times in the last months on LW that we should speak more about basics, it’s praise.
I think that this post has a certain quality, that unusual for LW.
I think ‘obvious’ is a word that not bad, but it’s not perfect for naming that quality. Do you have a better suggestion for naming that quality?
You may not have meant it, but I take this to be high praise. I’ve recently been trying to expand out of the thinking framework engendered by LW.
Perhaps, “clarificatory”, “definitional”, “retrospectively obvious”, “frameworking”?
Given that I wrote probably a dozen times in the last months on LW that we should speak more about basics, it’s praise.