rolls eyes at RQM (due to physicists trying to play silly semantic games that don’t actually translate into any coherent epistemology)
Try similarly tabooing “influence”.
Okay. “Without causal graphs that violate the Markov condition.”
It is likely that you will find that “non-communicating influence” is devoid of meaning
See above.
“Without causal graphs that violate the Markov condition.”
If someone could draw this graph for me for the case of the purported EPR FTL influence without relying on objective collapse, I’d appreciate it.
rolls eyes at RQM (due to physicists trying to play silly semantic games that don’t actually translate into any coherent epistemology)
Okay. “Without causal graphs that violate the Markov condition.”
See above.
If someone could draw this graph for me for the case of the purported EPR FTL influence without relying on objective collapse, I’d appreciate it.