Probably most people would add Jaynes position on QM to this. I believe he died still questioning Bell’s Theorem, and not accepting ontological randomness.
I actually think that’s correct, but I think I’m in the minority on that one.
It may be correct, but not for the reasons usually given: the non existence of ontological randomness is in now way entailed buy the existence of epistemic inderminism.
Probably most people would add Jaynes position on QM to this. I believe he died still questioning Bell’s Theorem, and not accepting ontological randomness.
I actually think that’s correct, but I think I’m in the minority on that one.
It may be correct, but not for the reasons usually given: the non existence of ontological randomness is in now way entailed buy the existence of epistemic inderminism.