yes, this has been very much on my mind: if this three-sided framework is useful/valid, what does it mean for the possibility of the different groups cooperating?
I suspect that the depressing answer is that cooperation will be a big challenge and may not happen at all. Especially as to questions such as “is the European AI Act in its present form a good start or a dangerous waste of time?” It strikes me that each of the three groups in the framework will have very strong feelings on this question
realists: yes, because, even if it is not perfect, it is at least a start on addressing important issues like invasion of privacy.
boosters: no, because it will stifle innovation
doomers: no, because you are looking under the lamp post where the light is better, rather than addressing the main risk, which is existential risk.
yes, this has been very much on my mind: if this three-sided framework is useful/valid, what does it mean for the possibility of the different groups cooperating?
I suspect that the depressing answer is that cooperation will be a big challenge and may not happen at all. Especially as to questions such as “is the European AI Act in its present form a good start or a dangerous waste of time?” It strikes me that each of the three groups in the framework will have very strong feelings on this question
realists: yes, because, even if it is not perfect, it is at least a start on addressing important issues like invasion of privacy.
boosters: no, because it will stifle innovation
doomers: no, because you are looking under the lamp post where the light is better, rather than addressing the main risk, which is existential risk.