Anyone who defines a problem (Goal) on Infinity Project, gets hyper-equity, which allows the user to own a fixed percentage of all the future ḥ that will be generated from ideas, projects, steps, tasks, and works below that specific goal.
If you look, currently the fraction of “hyper-equity” that a user can have, is very small (0.0001 to 0.001), and I believe we should use risk models to adjust it in the future, with everyone’s help, and choose the appropriate maximum amount of it. The reason why we have so little of hyper-equity, is because it precisely because we would like to avoid an unreasonable pyramid scheme.
In the real—not future—world one needs money to surivive. If one dislikes working for money, one needs to acquire money in other ways. Many of these other ways, from mooching to con games, are… problematic.
And so you appear on LW, mention that your family wasn’t rich (so you are unlikely to be a trust-fund baby), are very explicit that you dislike working for money, and propose a pyramid scheme.
LOL. I am a human, I think. Maybe? Could be a brain in a vat. Or a character in some alien kid’s SimEarth game. A chatbot which escaped from supersekrit lab, even? Hard to tell, really.
What kind of future do I want? That’s a very general question. Before this devolves into a list of positive adjectives, do you have something specific in mind?
So you are very undefined. I know that I’m an ‘infinitesimal’ part of the observable universe, which wishes to understand: the Universe, and where and how does it originate; wishes that everything that anyone truly wishes could really exist; and, doesn’t lose the hope to improve the whole Universe, because it knows that butterfly effect works… if used properly.
Knowing whether you are funded is useful estimating the lifetime of your project.
It’s also useful for understanding potential biases and the business model.
All these words and only for a pyramid scheme....
If you look, currently the fraction of “hyper-equity” that a user can have, is very small (0.0001 to 0.001), and I believe we should use risk models to adjust it in the future, with everyone’s help, and choose the appropriate maximum amount of it. The reason why we have so little of hyper-equity, is because it precisely because we would like to avoid an unreasonable pyramid scheme.
I did try to look. My browser said “Secure Connection Failed”.
So, all of hyper-equity can be controlled by 1,000 − 10,000 people?
Ha:) Is that because we use self-signed SSL cert? Try again. We’ll upgrade cert later.
No, as many people as there are problems (Goals). Potentially infinite.
If you’re looking for gullible recruits, you’ve come to the wrong place.
Don’t lease the Ferrari just yet.
My impression is “naive” rather than “cynically looking for gullible recruits”, for what it’s worth.
Yep, though the beginning, bolded in the original, is worrisome:
Is exciting! :) [To be rational, we must work for well-defined goals, not for money that lacks descriptive power.]
On the contrary, it is worrisome that some people treat others as merely workforce that can be bought, and lack any empathy whatsoever.
So, who feeds you and pays for your housing?
See, we are not talking about the modern world. We are talking about changing the world to create the world of abundance.
Yes, but in the meantime you have to eat every day. Right now, who supplies money to you?
What point which you want to make requires me answering ‘who supplies money to you?’ question?
In the real—not future—world one needs money to surivive. If one dislikes working for money, one needs to acquire money in other ways. Many of these other ways, from mooching to con games, are… problematic.
And so you appear on LW, mention that your family wasn’t rich (so you are unlikely to be a trust-fund baby), are very explicit that you dislike working for money, and propose a pyramid scheme.
[Lumifer], what you are? Are you what you think you are? What kind of future do you want to have?
LOL. I am a human, I think. Maybe? Could be a brain in a vat. Or a character in some alien kid’s SimEarth game. A chatbot which escaped from supersekrit lab, even? Hard to tell, really.
What kind of future do I want? That’s a very general question. Before this devolves into a list of positive adjectives, do you have something specific in mind?
So you are very undefined. I know that I’m an ‘infinitesimal’ part of the observable universe, which wishes to understand: the Universe, and where and how does it originate; wishes that everything that anyone truly wishes could really exist; and, doesn’t lose the hope to improve the whole Universe, because it knows that butterfly effect works… if used properly.
Sure. But you are talking about things inside your mind. How about things in reality, outside of your mind?
Who said that there exists the outside? :)
In that case I don’t understand your difficulties. Just persuade your mind to stop screwing around and give you what you want.
There are difficulties. Specifically:
how to get people write projects
how to get people fund projects
Improving trust and ease-of-use.
A mind is a puzzle to solve, too.
In the OP’s defense, he appeared on LW for a reason. The reason being that a pitch in the same ref. class worked on this cohort in the past.
To the extend that’s true the pitches were written in a way that’s not off-putting to a lot of people on LW.
Sure, the pitch that worked was a LOT better. But you can see the OP’s thought process.
Knowing whether you are funded is useful estimating the lifetime of your project. It’s also useful for understanding potential biases and the business model.